|
| |
Safe
companies are more profitable - studies show |
| |
|
| |
Taxes
and Incentives - What's The Law? |
| |
[NOTE:
If you are paying any taxes on your incentives, your paying
too much. Contact us today to get more value and results with
TAX-FREE incentive programs from C.A.SHORT Company.] |
| |
Section
274(j) of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted by the Tax Reform
Act of 1986, provides, in general, that an employer may deduct
the cost of employee achievement awards given to the same
employee up to $400.00 in any year. If the incentive awards
are employee achievement awards made under one or established
written plans or programs of the employer, the $400 deduction
limitation is increased to $1,600.00 per employee. |
| |
Under
Code section 74(c), however, the same awards are not included
in the income of the employee. In addition to being excluded
from the employee's taxable income, the employee achievement
awards are also excludable for employment tax purposes as
well as from the social security benefit base. The employer
must report on the employee's form W-2 as wages or compensation
any portion of the employee achievement awards that is included
in the employee's income. This amount is also treated accordingly
for all other tax purposes (including social security tax).
|
| |
In
order to qualify for this favorable tax treatment, an incentive
award must be an "employee achievement award," that is, it
must be an item of "tangible personal property" transferred
by an employer to an employee for safety achievement or length
of service. Moreover, the award must be given as part of a
meaningful presentation and cannot be the payment of disguised
compensation to the employee. Thus, for example, an incentive
award will not qualify for favorable tax treatment if it is
given at the same time that annual salary adjustments are
made, or if it's used as a substitute for a program of awarding
cash bonuses. Code section 274(j)(3)(A). |
| |
There
is very little guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service
("IRS") on employee achievement (incentive) awards. In the absence
of such authority, taxpayers have had to rely on the General
Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Joint Committee on
Taxation (JCS-10-87), commonly referred to as the "Blue Book,"
and regulations proposed by the IRS on January 9, 1989. These
regulations, Prop. Treas. Reg. Section 1.274-8 have not been
finalized and are not binding on taxpayers; however, they do
provide some insight as to the thinking of the IRS in this area.
|
| |
The
old regulations in effect before the enactment of Code section
274(j), Treas. Reg. Section 1.274-2(d)(1), defined an achievement
award as an item of "tangible personal property" given to
an employee for length of service, productivity, or safety
achievement. New Code section 274(j) does not include awards
for productivity in the definition of employee achievement
awards. Thus, apparently, an incentive award can be given
to employees for safety achievement or length of service only.
According to the Blue Book, an award given to an employee
for any other purpose, such as exceptional productivity, cannot
be excluded from his income. Blue Book at 35, n.14. In view
of the change in the law, employers have emphasized incentive
awards rewarding length of service and safety achievement
and have avoided productivity awards. |
| |
The
requirement that an employee achievement award must be an
item of "tangible personal property" has caused some confusion,
because Code section 274(j) does not define the meaning of
that term. The proposed regulations do provide some insight
into the meaning of "tangible personal property" by defining
it to exclude certain items. Accordingly, an incentive award
cannot be in the form of cash or a gift certificate (other
than a non-negotiable certificate conferring only the right
to receive tangible personal property). Any certificate that
may be converted to cash is not "tangible personal property"
and cannot qualify for preferential tax treatment under Code
section 274(j). Other items that are not tangible personal
property include travel, vacations, meals, lodging, tickets
to theater or sporting events, and stocks, bonds, or other
securities. Prop. Treas. Reg. Section 1.274-8(c)(2). As a
result, the fair market value of incentive travel awards given
to employees is always taxable as additional income to them
and deductible by the employer as compensation paid. Many
employers, therefore, reimburse employees for the additional
tax due as a result of the incentive travel award.
|
| |
A
length of service award can be excluded from an employee's
income if it is received by the employee after his first five
years of service with the employer making the award, and then
only if the employee has not received another length of service
award from the employer for at least five years (excluding
an award that is not taxable because it is de minimis fringe
benefit). Code section 274(j)(4)(B). An award for safety achievement
can be excluded from an employee's income only if that employee
is a full-time employee (other than a manager, administrator,
clerical worker, or other professional employee), and then
only if during the taxable year all other employee awards
for safety achievement have previously been made to 10% or
less of the eligible full-time employee awards for safety
employer (excluding awards that are not taxable because they
are de minimis fringe benefits). Code section 274(j)(4)(C).
Once the 10% limitation is exceeded in any given year, any
subsequent awards are not deductible under Code section 274(j).
|
| |
In
general, the employer's maximum deduction for all safety and
length of service awards provided to the same employee during
the taxable year cannot exceed $400,000, except if the award
is made under an established written plan or program. In that
case, the maximum deduction is increased to $1,600.00 for
the cost of all such awards made to the same employee during
the taxable year, whether for length of service or safety
achievement. Code section 274(j)(2). The separate $400.00
and $1,600.00 limitations cannot be added together so as to
provide a deduction in any year exceeding $1,600 for any one
employee. Code section 274(j)(2)(B). |
| |
While
the maximum deduction is $1,600.00 for any employee if the
safety or length of service award is granted under established
written plans or programs, the average cost per recipient
of all employee achievement awards given pursuant to all of
the employer's established written plans during any given
year cannot exceed $400.00. Code section 274(j)(3)(B)(ii).
For example, let's assume ten employees get awards under one
or more established written plans. If one employee receives
an award that costs $1,600, five employees each get an award
that costs $200.00, and four employees get an award that costs
$350.00, all of the employee achievement awards in the aggregate
amount of $4,000.00 are deductible. No portion of any of the
awards is included in any of the ten employees' income, because
the average cost of the awards per recipient is $400.00. |
| |
If
an award is one of "nominal value," its cost is excluded from
the calculation and is the total amount of incentive awards
given under established written plans or programs in any year.
It is unclear what constitutes nominal value for these purposes.
Prop. Treas. Reg. Section 274-8(c)(5)(ii) provides that $50.00
is nominal value, but some aggressive employers take the position
that an award of up to $100.00 should be treated as one of
nominal value. The IRS has not resolved this matter. Thus,
until the IRS adopts final regulations, it should be possible
to treat employee achievement awards with a value of no more
than $100.00, which are given under established written plans
or programs, as having nominal value and to exclude them from
the total of award costs under such plans or programs in computing
average cost per recipient. |
| |
The
amount of the award that the employee can exclude from his or
her income depends on the employer's adherence to the deduction
limitations of Code section 274(j). In other words, if the employer
can deduct the full cost of the award, the employee can exclude
the full cost of the award for his or her gross income. For
example, let's assume an employer awards an employee a crystal
bowl as a length of service award (but not under an established
written plan or program) and complies with the other relevant
criteria for incentive awards. The bowl costs the employer $400.00
and has a retail value of $500.00. Because the bowl did not
cost the employer more than $400.00, its full retail value of
$500.00 is excludable from the employee's gross income. Blue
Book, at 36. |
| |
If
the employer exceeds the cost limitations for the award and
loses a portion of the deduction, the employee's exclusion from
income is only preserved in part. In this case, the employee
must include in his gross income the greater of (1) an amount
equal to the portion of the cost to the employer of the award
that was not allowable as a deduction to the employer (not in
excess of the fair market value of the award) or (2) the amount
by which the fair market value of the award exceeds the maximum
dollar amount allowable as a deduction to the employer. Code
section 72(c)(2). The remaining portion of the fair market value
of the award is not included in the employer's gross income.
Blue Book, at 36. For example, let's assume that the crystal
bowl described in the last example cost the employer $500.00,
rather than $400.0, and its fair market value is $475.00. In
this case, the employer's deduction is limited to $40.00 and
the amount includible by the employee in his income is $100.00,
the greater of (1) the difference between the items fair market
value exceeds the deduction limitation ($100.00) or (2) the
amount by which the item's fair market value exceeds the deduction
limitation ($75.00). If the fair market value had been $600.00,
the amount includible in the employee's income would have been
$200.00. Blue Book, at 37. |
| |
The
fact that IRS has not issued any guidance and has not finalized
the proposed regulations under Code section 274(j) leaves several
unanswered questions regarding employee incentive awards. My
conversations with the IRS and Treasury indicate that they consider
final regulations in this area to be a low priority item in
the current legislative climate. One unfortunate aspect of this
lack of action is that travel awards must be treated as nonqualified,
taxable cash awards. (This is consistent with the proposed regulations
that are still in effect.) |
| |
On
the other hand, the inaction of the IRS creates tax planning
opportunities (as well as risks) for imaginative companies.
Since the IRS remains hostile toward the use of employee achievement
awards, however, its inaction probably benefits the incentive
industry. |
| |
by
George Delta, Esq., Advisor to IMA |
| |
|
|
|